<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The PT Symmeter &#187; King&#8217;s College London</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ptsymmetry.net/?cat=358&#038;feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ptsymmetry.net</link>
	<description>PT Symmetry articles and information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2014 09:54:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Infinitely many inequivalent field theories from one Lagrangian</title>
		<link>http://ptsymmetry.net/?p=1794&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=infinitely-many-inequivalent-field-theories-from-one-lagrangian</link>
		<comments>http://ptsymmetry.net/?p=1794#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 21:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dwh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[City University London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imperial College London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King's College London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory Division - CERN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington University in St Louis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl M. Bender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel W. Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick E. Mavromatos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarben Sarkar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ptsymmetry.net/?p=1794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carl M. Bender, Daniel W. Hook, Nick E. Mavromatos, Sarben Sarkar Logarithmic time-like Liouville quantum field theory has a generalized PT invariance, where T is the time-reversal operator and P stands for an S-duality reflection of the Liouville field \(\phi\). In Euclidean space the Lagrangian of such a theory, \(L=\frac{1}{2}(\nabla\phi)^2−ig\phi \exp(ia\phi)\), is analyzed using the&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="background-color: transparent;">Carl M. Bender, Daniel W. Hook, Nick E. Mavromatos, Sarben Sarkar</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: transparent;">Logarithmic time-like Liouville quantum field theory has a generalized PT invariance, where T is the time-reversal operator and P stands for an S-duality reflection of the Liouville field \(\phi\). In Euclidean space the Lagrangian of such a theory, \(L=\frac{1}{2}(\nabla\phi)^2−ig\phi \exp(ia\phi)\), is analyzed using the techniques of PT-symmetric quantum theory. It is shown that L defines an infinite number of unitarily inequivalent sectors of the theory labeled by the integer n. In one-dimensional space (quantum mechanics) the energy spectrum is calculated in the semiclassical limit and the \(m\)th energy level in the \(n\)th sector is given by \(E_{m,n}∼(m+1/2)^2a^2/(16n^2)\).</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: transparent;"><a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1408.2432" target="_blank">http://arxiv.org/abs/1408.2432</a><br />
High Energy Physics &#8211; Theory (hep-th); Mathematical Physics (math-ph); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ptsymmetry.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1794</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Double-Scaling Limit of the O(N)-Symmetric Anharmonic Oscillator</title>
		<link>http://ptsymmetry.net/?p=1307&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=double-scaling-limit-of-the-on-symmetric-anharmonic-oscillator</link>
		<comments>http://ptsymmetry.net/?p=1307#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dwh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[King's College London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington University in St Louis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl M. Bender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarben Sarkar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ptsymmetry.net/?p=1307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carl M. Bender, Sarben Sarkar In an earlier paper it was argued that the conventional double-scaling limit of an O(N)-symmetric quartic quantum field theory is inconsistent because the critical coupling constant is negative and thus the integral representing the partition function of the critical theory does not exist. In this earlier paper it was shown&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl M. Bender, Sarben Sarkar</p>
<p>In an earlier paper it was argued that the conventional double-scaling limit of an O(N)-symmetric quartic quantum field theory is inconsistent because the critical coupling constant is negative and thus the integral representing the partition function of the critical theory does not exist. In this earlier paper it was shown that for an O(N)-symmetric quantum field theory in zero-dimensional spacetime one can avoid this difficulty if one replaces the original quartic theory by its PT-symmetric analog. In the current paper an O(N)-symmetric quartic quantum field theory in one-dimensional spacetime [that is, O(N)-symmetric quantum mechanics] is studied using the Schroedinger equation. It is shown that the global PT-symmetric formulation of this differential equation provides a consistent way to perform the double-scaling limit of the O(N)-symmetric anharmonic oscillator. The physical nature of the critical behavior is explained by studying the PT-symmetric quantum theory and the corresponding and equivalent Hermitian quantum theory.<br />
<a href=" http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.4348" target="_blank"></p>
<p>http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.4348</a></p>
<p>High Energy Physics &#8211; Theory (hep-th); Mathematical Physics (math-ph); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ptsymmetry.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1307</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unbounded C-symmetries and their nonuniqueness</title>
		<link>http://ptsymmetry.net/?p=858&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=unbounded-c-symmetries-and-their-nonuniqueness</link>
		<comments>http://ptsymmetry.net/?p=858#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 08:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dwh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AGH University of Science and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King's College London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl M. Bender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sergii Kuzhel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ptsymmetry.net/?p=858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carl M. Bender, Sergii Kuzhel It is shown that if the C operator for a PT-symmetric Hamiltonian with simple eigenvalues is not unique, then it is unbounded. Apart from the special cases of finite-matrix Hamiltonians and Hamiltonians generated by differential expressions with PT-symmetric point interactions, the usual situation is that the C operator is unbounded.&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl M. Bender, Sergii Kuzhel</p>
<p>It is shown that if the C operator for a PT-symmetric Hamiltonian with simple eigenvalues is not unique, then it is unbounded. Apart from the special cases of finite-matrix Hamiltonians and Hamiltonians generated by differential expressions with PT-symmetric point interactions, the usual situation is that the C operator is unbounded. The fact that the C operator is unbounded is significant because, while there is a formal equivalence between a PT-symmetric Hamiltonian and a conventionally Hermitian Hamiltonian in the sense that the two Hamiltonians are isospectral, the Hilbert spaces are inequivalent. This is so because the mapping from one Hilbert space to the other is unbounded. This shows that PT-symmetric quantum theories are mathematically distinct from conventional Hermitian quantum theories.</p>
<p><a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.1176" target="_blank">http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.1176</a><br />
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Mathematical Physics (math-ph)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ptsymmetry.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=858</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PT phase transition in multidimensional quantum systems</title>
		<link>http://ptsymmetry.net/?p=848&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=pt-phase-transition-in-multidimensional-quantum-systems</link>
		<comments>http://ptsymmetry.net/?p=848#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dwh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Imperial College London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King's College London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington University in St Louis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl M. Bender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David J. Weir]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ptsymmetry.net/?p=848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carl M. Bender, David J. Weir Non-Hermitian PT-symmetric quantum-mechanical Hamiltonians generally exhibit a phase transition that separates two parametric regions, (i) a region of unbroken PT symmetry in which the eigenvalues are all real, and (ii) a region of broken PT symmetry in which some of the eigenvalues are complex. This transition has recently been&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl M. Bender, David J. Weir</p>
<p>Non-Hermitian PT-symmetric quantum-mechanical Hamiltonians generally exhibit a phase transition that separates two parametric regions, (i) a region of unbroken PT symmetry in which the eigenvalues are all real, and (ii) a region of broken PT symmetry in which some of the eigenvalues are complex. This transition has recently been observed experimentally in a variety of physical systems. Until now, theoretical studies of the PT phase transition have generally been limited to one-dimensional models. Here, four nontrivial coupled PT-symmetric Hamiltonians, \(H=p^2/2+x^2/2+q^2/2+y^2/2+igx^2y\), \(H=p^2/2+x^2/2+q^2/2+y^2+igx^2y\), \(H=p^2/2+x^2/2+q^2/2+y^2/2+r^2/2+z^2/2+igxyz\), and \(H=p^2/2+x^2/2+q^2/2+y^2+r^2/2+3z^2/2+igxyz\) are examined. Based on extensive numerical studies, this paper conjectures that all four models exhibit a phase transition. The transitions are found to occur at \(g\approx 0.1\), \(g\approx 0.04\), \(g\approx 0.1\), and \(g\approx 0.05\). These results suggest that the PT phase transition is a robust phenomenon not limited to systems having one degree of freedom.</p>
<p><a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.5100" target="_blank">http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.5100</a><br />
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); High Energy Physics &#8211; Theory (hep-th); Mathematical Physics (math-ph)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ptsymmetry.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=848</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Observation of PT phase transition in a simple mechanical system</title>
		<link>http://ptsymmetry.net/?p=846&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=observation-of-pt-phase-transition-in-a-simple-mechanical-system</link>
		<comments>http://ptsymmetry.net/?p=846#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dwh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Imperial College London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King's College London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington University in St Louis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bjorn K. Berntson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl M. Bender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Parker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E. Samuel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ptsymmetry.net/?p=846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carl M. Bender, Bjorn K. Berntson, David Parker, E. Samuel If a Hamiltonian is PT symmetric, there are two possibilities: Either the eigenvalues are entirely real, in which case the Hamiltonian is said to be in an unbroken-PT-symmetric phase, or else the eigenvalues are partly real and partly complex, in which case the Hamiltonian is&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl M. Bender, Bjorn K. Berntson, David Parker, E. Samuel</p>
<p>If a Hamiltonian is PT symmetric, there are two possibilities: Either the eigenvalues are entirely real, in which case the Hamiltonian is said to be in an unbroken-PT-symmetric phase, or else the eigenvalues are partly real and partly complex, in which case the Hamiltonian is said to be in a broken-PT-symmetric phase. As one varies the parameters of the Hamiltonian, one can pass through the phase transition that separates the unbroken and broken phases. This transition has recently been observed in a variety of laboratory experiments. This paper explains the phase transition in a simple and intuitive fashion and then describes an extremely elementary experiment in which the phase transition is easily observed.</p>
<p><a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.4972" target="_blank">http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.4972</a><br />
Mathematical Physics (math-ph); High Energy Physics &#8211; Theory (hep-th); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ptsymmetry.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=846</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Resolution of Inconsistency in the Double-Scaling Limit</title>
		<link>http://ptsymmetry.net/?p=843&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=resolution-of-inconsistency-in-the-double-scaling-limit</link>
		<comments>http://ptsymmetry.net/?p=843#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dwh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[King's College London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington University in St Louis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl M. Bender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moshe Moshe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarben Sarkar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ptsymmetry.net/?p=843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carl M. Bender, Moshe Moshe, Sarben Sarkar The conventional double-scaling limit of a quartic quantum field theory is inconsistent because the critical coupling constant is negative. Thus, at the critical coupling the Lagrangian appears to define a quantum theory whose energy is complex. Worse yet, the functional integral for the partition function of the theory&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl M. Bender, Moshe Moshe, Sarben Sarkar</p>
<p>The conventional double-scaling limit of a quartic quantum field theory is inconsistent because the critical coupling constant is negative. Thus, at the critical coupling the Lagrangian appears to define a quantum theory whose energy is complex. Worse yet, the functional integral for the partition function of the theory does not exist. It is shown that one can avoid these difficulties if one approaches this correlated limit in a PT-symmetric fashion. The partition function is calculated explicitly in the double-scaling limit of an zero-dimensional O(N)-symmetric quartic model.</p>
<p><a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.4943" target="_blank">http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.4943</a><br />
High Energy Physics &#8211; Theory (hep-th); Mathematical Physics (math-ph); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ptsymmetry.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=843</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ordinary versus PT-symmetric φ^3 quantum field theory</title>
		<link>http://ptsymmetry.net/?p=679&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ordinary-versus-pt-symmetric-%25cf%25863-quantum-field-theory</link>
		<comments>http://ptsymmetry.net/?p=679#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dwh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[King's College London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Catania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington University in St Louis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl M. Bender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emanuele Messina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V. Branchina]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ptsymmetry.net/?p=679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carl M. Bender, V. Branchina, Emanuele Messina A quantum-mechanical theory is PT-symmetric if it is described by a Hamiltonian that commutes with PT, where the operator P performs space reflection and the operator T performs time reversal. A PT-symmetric Hamiltonian often has a parametric region of unbroken PT symmetry in which the energy eigenvalues are&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl M. Bender, V. Branchina, Emanuele Messina</p>
<p>A quantum-mechanical theory is PT-symmetric if it is described by a Hamiltonian that commutes with PT, where the operator P performs space reflection and the operator T performs time reversal. A PT-symmetric Hamiltonian often has a parametric region of unbroken PT symmetry in which the energy eigenvalues are all real. There may also be a region of broken PT symmetry in which some of the eigenvalues are complex. These regions are separated by a phase transition that has been repeatedly observed in laboratory experiments. This paper focuses on the properties of a PT-symmetric ig\phi^3 quantum field theory. This quantum field theory is the analog of the PT-symmetric quantum-mechanical theory described by the Hamiltonian H=p^2+ix^3, whose eigenvalues have been rigorously shown to be all real. This paper compares the renormalization-group properties of a conventional Hermitian g\phi^3 quantum field theory with those of the PT-symmetric ig\phi^3 quantum field theory. It is shown that while the conventional g\phi^3 theory in d=6 dimensions is asymptotically free, the ig\phi^3 theory is like a g\phi^4 theory in d=4 dimensions; it is energetically stable, perturbatively renormalizable, and trivial.</p>
<p><a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.1244" target="_blank">http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.1244</a><br />
High Energy Physics &#8211; Theory (hep-th); Mathematical Physics (math-ph); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ptsymmetry.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=679</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
